4.7 Article

Long-term, fine-scale temporal patterns of genetic diversity in the restored Mauritius parakeet reveal genetic impacts of management and associated demographic effects on reintroduction programmes

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 28-38

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.013

关键词

Dispersal; Endangered parrot; Fine-scale; Genetic diversity; Reintroduction; Monitoring; Psittacula echo

资金

  1. NERC CASE PhD studentship award
  2. Natural Environment Research Council, UK
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NBAF010001] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NBAF010001] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Threatened populations of birds are often restored after bottleneck events by using reintroduction techniques. Whilst population numbers are often increased by using such measures, the long-term genetic effects of reintroductions and post-release management of the resulting populations are frequently overlooked. We identify an overall declining trend in population-wide estimates of genetic diversity over two decades since the initial recovery of the population from the most severe part of this species' bottleneck. Additionally, by incorporating the genotypes of known founding individuals into population viability simulations, we evaluate the genetic effects of population management under various scenarios at both the metapopulation and subpopulation levels. We reveal that whilst population augmentation has led to increased genetic homogenisation among subpopulations, significant differentiation still exists. Simulations predict that even with a low level of natural dispersal leading to gene-flow this differentiation could be ameliorated. We conclude by offering a number of key recommendations relating to post-recovery management of reintroduced bird populations which support the encouragement of individual dispersal using established management techniques such as artificial nest-site provisioning. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据