4.7 Article

Habitat selection of a large carnivore, the red wolf, in a human-altered landscape

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 324-330

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.004

关键词

Canis rufus; Habitat selection; Human-altered habitat; Human density; Land-cover; Resource selection function

资金

  1. North Carolina Department of Transportation
  2. USFWS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large carnivores, with their expansive home range and resource requirements, are a good model for understanding how animal populations alter habitat selection and use as human densities and development increase. We examined the habitat selection of red wolves (Canis rufus) in North Carolina, USA, where the population of red wolves resides in a mosaic of naturally occurring and human-associated land cover. We used locations from 20 GPS-collared red wolves, monitored over 3 years, to develop resource selection functions at the landscape level. Red wolves selected for human-associated land-cover over other land-cover types. Red wolves also selected areas near secondary roads. However, red wolves avoided areas with high human density, and avoidance of natural land-cover types decreased as human density increased; this interaction was strong enough that red wolves selected for natural land-cover types over human-associated land-cover types at relatively high human density. Similarly, avoidance of natural land-cover types decreased when they were near secondary roads. These results suggest that red wolves will use human-associated landscapes, but modify their habitat selection patterns with increased human presence. Such findings suggest that large carnivores such as the red wolf may not strictly require habitats devoid of humans. In a world with rapid human-alteration of habitat, understanding how increasing human density and development impact habitat selection is vital to managing for population persistence of large carnivores and maintaining top-down ecological processes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据