4.7 Article

Interactions between methyl ketones and β-lactoglobulin:: Sensory analysis, headspace analysis, and mathematical modeling

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 9, 页码 4246-4251

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf991261z

关键词

binding; aroma; protein; odor intensity; mathematical modeling; interfacial mass transfer; partitioning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interaction of flavor compounds with proteins is known to have an influence on the release of flavor from food. Hydrophobic interactions were found between beta-lactoglobulin and methyl ketones; the affinity constant increases by increasing the hydrophobic chain. Addition of beta-lactoglobulin (0.5 and 1%) to aroma solutions (12.5, 50, and 100 mu L L-1) of three methyl ketones induces a significant decrease in odor intensity. The chosen methyl ketones were 2-heptanone (K-b = 330), 2-octanone (K-b = 950), and 2-nonanone (K-b = 2440). The release of these flavor compounds (50 mu L L-1) was studied by static headspace in water solution (50 mM NaCl, pH 3) with different concentrations of beta-lactoglobulin (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4%). Increasing the concentration of protein increases the retention of volatiles, and this effect is greatest for 2-nonanone, the compound with the highest affinity constant, and lowest for 2-heptanone. A mathematical model previously developed to describe flavor release from aqueous solutions containing flavor-binding polymers (Harrison, M.; Hills, B.P. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 1883-1890) was used to interpret the data. The model assumes that the polymer-flavor interaction is reversible and the rate-limiting step for release is the transfer of volatiles across the macroscopic gas-liquid interface. This model was used to predict the equilibrium partitioning properties and the rate of release of the three methyl ketones. Increasing the affinity constant leads to decreased release rates and a lower final headspace aroma concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据