4.4 Article

Identification of efficiently cleaved substrates for HIV-1 protease using a phage display library and use in inhibitor development

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 274, 期 2, 页码 391-401

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/viro.2000.0420

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL52475] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI40882] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM48870] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recognition sequences for substrate cleavage by aspartic protease of HIV-1 are diverse and cleavage specificities are controlled by complex interactions between at least six amino acids around the cleavage site. We have identified 45 efficiently cleaved peptide substrates of HIV-1 protease (PR) using substrate phage display, an approach that can elucidate both context-dependent and context-independent preferences at individual subsites of a protease substrate. Many of the selected peptides were cleaved more efficiently and had lower K-m values than physiologically relevant substrates of HIV-1 PR. Therefore, mutations occurring in the cleavage sites of the Gag and Gag-pol polyproteins of HIV-1 could significantly lower the K-m values to better compete against drugs for protease binding while maintaining cleavage rates necessary for viral replication. The most efficiently cleaved peptide substrate derived from these phage, Ac-GSGIF*LETSL-NH2, was cleaved 60 times more efficiently and had a K-m approximately 260 times lower than a nine-amino-acid peptide based on the natural reverse transcriptase/integrase cleavage site when assayed at pH 5.6, 0.2 M NaCl. The peptide substrates selected served as frameworks for synthesis of tight binding reduced amide inhibitors of HIV-1 PR. The results show that the most efficiently cleaved substrates serve as the best templates for synthesis of the tightest binding inhibitors. Thus, defining changes in substrate preferences for drug-resistant proteases may aid in the development of more efficacious inhibitors. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据