4.7 Article

Plant species extinction debt in a temperate biodiversity hotspot: Community, species and functional traits approaches

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 144, 期 5, 页码 1619-1629

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.02.013

关键词

Belgium; Calcareous grasslands; Extinction debt; Functional traits; Methodology comparisons; Species level approaches; Vascular plants

资金

  1. Walloon Public Service (DGARNE-DNF)
  2. FRS-FNRS [FRFC 2.4556.05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Destruction and fragmentation of (semi-) natural habitats are considered the main causes of biodiversity loss worldwide. Plant species may exhibit a slow response to fragmentation, resulting in the development of an extinction debt in fragmented plant communities. The detection of extinction debt is of primary importance in habitat conservation strategies. We applied two different approaches proposed in the literature to identify extinction debt in South-East Belgium calcareous grasslands. The first method compared species richness between stable and fragmented habitat patches. The second explored correlations between current species richness and current and past landscape configurations using multiple regression analyses. We subsequently examined results generated by both methods. In addition, we proposed techniques to identify species that are more likely to support extinction debt and associated functional traits. We estimated a respective extinction debt of approximately 28% and 35% of the total and specialist species richness. Similar results were obtained from both methods. We identified 15 threatened specialist species under the current landscape configuration. It is likely the landscape configuration no longer supports the species habitat requirements. We demonstrated that non-clonal species are most threatened, as well as taxa that cannot persist in degraded habitats and form only sparsely distributed populations. We discussed our results in light of other studies in similar habitats, and the overall implications for habitat conservation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据