4.7 Article

Three-dimensional partitioning of diversity informs state-wide strategies for the conservation of saproxylic beetles

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 143, 期 3, 页码 625-633

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.027

关键词

Canopy diversity; Critical diversity scales; Natura 2000; Null hypothesis; Species richness; Strictly protected areas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global conventions on biological diversity force governments to develop region-wide conservation strategies. Such strategies are difficult to design for all taxa because little is known about the important spatial scales. Here we applied additive partitioning of the diversity of saproxylic beetles in Bavarian forests in Southern Germany using a nested hierarchical design of five increasingly broader spatial levels: trap, strata, forest stand, forest site, and ecoregion. We consistently found a significantly higher percentage than expected by chance of between ecoregion diversity and significantly lower a diversity within traps. A significant proportion of beta diversity was also found between stands. Analysis of species represented by <0.005% of all specimens in our samples and of species classified as threatened revealed similar results. Critical spatial scales for threatened species encompassed the critical levels of common species. Within habitat substratum guilds, the proportion of beta diversity increased from species associated with fresh wood to those associated with rotten wood to those associated with fungi. Our results suggest that the most effective way to ensure saproxylic beetle diversity in a state-wide strategy is to add new conservation sites within different ecoregions and to establish new conservation areas in additional forest stands, rather than to enlarge reserves. Our findings further suggest that monitoring of saproxylic beetle diversity on a broader scale in European temperate forests can be restricted to monitoring species, i.e. a subgroup of families easy to identify, and that canopy sampling can be neglected without a substantial loss of information. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据