4.7 Article

An evaluation of two potential risk factors, MHC diversity and host density, for infection by an invasive nematode Ashworthius sidemi in endangered European bison (Bison bonasus)

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 143, 期 9, 页码 2049-2053

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.012

关键词

Parasites; Infection; Susceptibility; Population density; Extinction; Bottleneck; Management; Supplementary feeding

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [PB 2893/P01/2007/33]
  2. Frankfurt Zoological Society-Help for Threatened Wildlife
  3. European Community [LIFE06 NAT/PL/000105 BISON-LAND]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parasites are thought to increase the risk of host extinction, but their dynamics in endangered species have not been well investigated. The free-living European bison population in Bialowieza Forest has recently been massively invaded by a blood-sucking nematode, Ashworthius sidemi. This nematode originated in Asia and was probably transmitted to Europe with the introduction of the sika deer. Here, we investigate the impacts of genetic factors (the Major Histocompatibility Complex class II genes responsible for extracellular parasite recognition) and management practices (supplementary feeding affecting winter population density) on the intensity of A. sidemi infections in bison. All but two out of 110 animals investigated between 2005 and 2009 were infected with A. sidemi, and the intensity of infection increased significantly with time. Due to a severe population bottleneck experienced by the bison, only four class II DRB alleles are retained in the Bialowieza population. We found that despite high sequence divergence, neither any of the alleles nor DRB heterozygosity was significantly associated with infection intensity. We did find, however, that winter density of bison herds was positively associated with infection intensity. Winter bison population densities were in turn predicted by the intensity of supplementary feeding. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据