4.6 Article

Inhibiting proteasomes in human HepG2 and LNCaP cells increases endogenous androgen receptor levels

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3424

关键词

ubiquitination; MG132; GSK3 beta; PEST; beta-catenin; androgen receptor; proteasome; HepG2; LNCaP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treating HepG2 cells with MG132 for 4 h to inhibit proteasomal activity increased androgen receptor immunoreactivity in two major bands with molecular weights of 102 and 110 kDa by 77% each (P < 0.05). MG132 treatment also increased the overall level of polyubiquitinated proteins between 66 and 220 kDa by 140% (P < 0.05), Antiubiquitin immunoreactivity comigrating with the androgen receptor bands was also increased by MG132 treatment. Two other proteasome inhibitors, lactacystin and epoxomycin, caused similar increases in the androgen receptor in HepG2 cells. Proteosome-inhibition studies conducted in LNCaP cells also showed that the two major androgen receptor bands with molecular weights of 102 and 110 kDa were increased by 85 and 115%, respectively (P < 0.05 for both) by MG132 treatment. Overall levels of polyubiquitinated proteins with molecular weights between 66 and 220 kDa increased 365%. Ubiquitin immunoreactivity comigrating with the androgen receptor bands was also significantly increased. Thus inhibiting proteasomes in two human androgen-responsive cell lines increases endogenous androgen receptor levels as well as androgen receptor-associated ubiquitin-modified immunoreactivity. The regulation of steady-state levels of endogenous androgen receptor by proteasomal degradation could be involved in its rapid turnover in the absence of ligand and would provide a mechanism for limiting androgen responses. A PEST sequence similar to one in the vitamin D receptor is present in the hinge region of all known mammalian androgen receptors, suggesting that it may function in proteasome-mediated androgen receptor turnover. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据