4.8 Article

Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study

期刊

LANCET
卷 356, 期 9234, 页码 975-981

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02714-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death tate after repair of tetralogy of Fallot are devastating complications in adult survivors of early surgery, but their prediction remains difficult. Methods We examined surgical, electrocardiographic, and late haemodynamic data, and their relation to clinical arrhythmia and sudden death occurring over 10 years, in a multicentre cohort of patients with repaired tetralogy, who were alive in 1985. Results Of 793 patients (mean age at repair 8.2 years [SD 8], mean time from repair 21.1 years [8.7]) who entered the study, 33 patients developed sustained monomorphic Ventricular tachycardia, 16 died suddenly, and 29 had new-onset sustained atrial flutter or fibrillation. Electrocardiographic markers (QRS duration, QRS rate of change between 1985 and 1995) were significantly greater in the Ventricular tachycardia and sudden-death groups. Older age at repair was associated with a higher risk of sudden death and atrial tachyarrhythmia. Pulmonary regurgitation was the main underlying haemodynamic lesion for patients with ventricular tachycardia and sudden death, whereas tricuspid regurgitation was for those with atrial flutter/fibrillation. Despite adverse haemodynamics, no patient who died suddenly had undergone late reoperation. Conclusion Arrhythmia and sudden death are important late sequelae for: patients after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. The electrophysiological and haemodynamic substrate of sudden death resembled that of sustained ventricular tachycardia, with pulmonary regurgitation being the predominant haemodynamic lesion. Preservation or restoration of pulmonary Valve function may thus reduce the risk of sudden death. Furthermore, electrocardiographic markers can help to identify patients at risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据