4.8 Article

A kinetic study of ethylene and 1-hexene homo- and copolymerization catalyzed by a silica-supported Cr(IV) complex: Evidence for propagation by a migratory insertion mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 122, 期 37, 页码 8968-8976

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja001693m

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surface organometallic fragment (equivalent to SiO)(2)Cr=CHCMe3 initiates the polymerization of ethylene and 1-hexene at room temperature in the absence of organoaluminum or other activators. The kinetics at the gas-solid interface were studied by in situ IR spectroscopy in a constant volume, variable pressure reactor. At low pressures, the reaction is first order in P(C2H4), first order in the number of moles of chromium, and linearly dependent on the Cr loading on silica. The second-order rate constant for polymerization is (177 +/- 3) s(-1) (mol Cr)(-1) at 21 degrees C, and is virtually unchanged upon subsequent additions of ethylene to the catalyst. The kinetic isotope effect, k(C2H4)/k(C2D4), is a meagre 1.29. The temperature dependence of the second-order rate constants yields Delta H double dagger(obs) = (30.2 +/- 0.9) kJ/mol and Delta S double dagger(obs) = (-99 +/- 3) J/(K.mol). These values are consistent with a propagation mechanism of agostically assisted migratory insertion at an alkylchromium(IV) active site. They are inconsistent with an alternating alkylidene/metallacycle mechanism requiring rate-determining C-H cleavage. The rate of polymerization is accelerated by a factor of 3.2 in the presence of 18 mol % H-2 Homopolymerization of 1-hexene is only 4.7 times slower than that of ethylene, an effect attributed to weaker preequilibrium binding of the substituted olefin which is partially compensated by faster migratory insertion. Copolymerization of ethylene and 1-hexene is random. It results in slower incorporation of ethylene but faster incorporation of 1-hexene relative to their respective homopolymerization rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据