4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Properties of Bacillus cereus and other bacilli contaminating biomaterial-based industrial processes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 2-3, 页码 231-239

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00313-5

关键词

Bacillus; Bacillus cereus; food hygiene; food packaging; paperboard; lecithinase; nitrate reductase; emetic toxin; whole cell fatty acids; ribotyping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper is an overview on bacilli in industrial processes, with focus on food grade paper and paperboard production. Paperboards mainly contain sporeforming bacteria belonging to the genera Bacillus, Paenibacillus and Brevibacillus, usually found in quantities from < 50 to 250 cfu g(-1) homogenized paperboard. Of those frequently found, Bacillus cereus group, B. licheniformis, B. subtilis and Brevibacillus brevis are important for food hygiene because of their hydrolytic activities on food components and the ability of some strains to produce food poisoning toxins or to grow at refrigerated temperatures. We found that the phenotypic properties (lecithinase activity, nitrate reduction) used in standard methods (e.g., LSO, FDA, IDF) to recognize B. cereus, were unreliable for industrial isolates. Whole cell fatty acid composition of a group of the industrial isolates deviated so much from those in a widely used commercial database that the strains were not or only poorly recognized as B. cereus. Industrial isolates, including toxigenic ones, often missed one or more of these characters, even in cases where 100% 16S rDNA identity was found with B. cereus or with B. thuringiensis. 11-Methyldodecanoic acid and trans-9-hexadecenoic acid were found without exception in over 200 industrial B. cereus group isolates and in over 30 culture collection strains. The detection of these fatty acids is a secure method for the identification of B. cereus. Negative reaction for starch hydrolysis and for BCET-RPLA test and a specific ribotype were found in all B. cereus strains producing the emetic toxin. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据