4.4 Article

Catalytic control and coupling efficiency of the Escherichia coli FoF1 ATP synthase:: Influence of the Fo sector and ε subunit on the catalytic transition state

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 38, 页码 11830-11836

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0013694

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM50957, R01 GM050957] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rate-limiting transition state of steady-state ATP hydrolysis and synthesis reactions in the F0F1 ATP synthase involves the rotation of the gamma, epsilon, and c subunits. To probe the role of the transport and coupling mechanisms in controlling catalysis, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of ATP hydrolysis were determined for enzymes in the presence of the detergent lauryldimethylamine oxide (LDAO), which uncouples active transport and disables the inhibitory effect of the epsilon subunit. At 5 mM LDAO or greater, the inhibitory effects of epsilon subunit are abrogated in both purified Fl and membranous F0F1. In these conditions, LDAO solubilized F0F1 has a higher k(cat) for ATP hydrolysis than F-1. These results indicate an influence of F-0 on F-1 even though catalysis is uncoupled from transport. The alpha(3)beta(3)gamma complex free of the epsilon subunit is activated at a lower concentration of 0.5 mM LDAO. Significantly, the gamma Y205C mutant enzyme is similarity activated at 0.5 mM LDAO, suggesting that the mutant enzyme lacks epsilon inhibition. The gamma Y205C F0F1 which has a k(cat) for ATP hydrolysis 2-fold higher than wild type, has an ATP synthesis rate 3-fold lower than wild type, showing that coupling is inefficient. Arrhenius and isokinetic analyses indicate that enzymes that are free of epsilon subunit inhibition have a different transition-state structure from those under the influence of the epsilon subunit. We propose that the epsilon subunit is one of the factors that determines the proper transition-state structure, which is essential for efficient coupling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据