4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The increasing incidence and prevalence of MS in a Sardinian province

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 55, 期 6, 页码 842-847

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.55.6.842

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To verify incidence rates and their temporal trend in a homogeneous, ethnically, and genetically distinct population of central Sardinia (the Nuoro province). Background: Intensive epidemiologic studies carried out in Sardinia since the 1970s have suggested that the prevalence and incidence of MS are much higher in this Mediterranean island compared with those found on mainland Italy. Methods: The study area had a population of approximate;y 274,000 people in the 1991 census. The authors adopted a complete enumerative approach by reviewing all possible sources of case collection available in the investigative area. Results: Based on 469 MS patients, the mean annual incidence for 1955 to 1995 was 4.18 per 100,000 (or 4.3 per 100,000 if age- and sex-adjusted to the European population). The incidence, averaging 1.95 per 100,000 during 1955 to 1959, rose progressively over time, reaching rates of 6.6 in the quinquiennium 1985 to 1989 and 6.4 per 100,000 in 1990 to 1995. On December 31, 1994, the crude prevalence, based on 415 MS patients alive in the study area, was 151.9 per 100,000 (156.6 if adjusted to the European population). Conclusion: These incidence and prevalence rates are the highest to date that have been estimated for a large community in southern Europe, and they constitute some of the highest rates in the world. Based on other surveys, these results reinforce the position of Sardinia as a higher and rising prevalence area for MS compared with other Mediterranean populations. Genetic and social-historic data strengthen the hypothesis of the environmental role and genetic factors among Sardinians in determining the notable difference in MS frequency between Sardinians and other Mediterraneans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据