4.7 Article

The influence of bark beetles outbreak vs. salvage logging on ground layer vegetation in Central European mountain spruce forests

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 141, 期 6, 页码 1525-1535

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.013

关键词

bark beetle outbreak; understory vegetation; mountain spruce forests; salvage logging; disturbance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in the herb and moss layers of mountain spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests after bark beetle (lps typographus (L.)) outbreak were compared with and without forestry intervention. The study area is situated in the Sumava National Park (Czech Republic, Central Europe), where an extensive bark beetle outbreak occurred in the 1990s. Parts of forests were left without interventions, while salvage logging was applied in other areas. Altogether, 18 permanent research plots were established in: (1) climax stands with completely dead canopy, (2) climax stands where salvage logging was applied (clearcuts), and (3) waterlogged stands with only partly dead canopy. Vegetation composition of the ground layer and species numbers were evaluated in 1997 and 2002. The effect of salvage logging on vegetation was greater than that of the bark beetle outbreak itself. Forest herb species and partly also bryophytes survived relatively well under untouched dead canopy. The fewest changes occurred under the partly dead canopy in waterlogged forests. The herb layer expanded in clearcuts originated due to salvage logging, being dominated by grasses. Bryophytes were more susceptible to logging than herbs; their cover in clearcuts was markedly lower and composition changed towards pioneer species. The results show that a natural succession of mountain spruce forests after a bark beetle outbreak, if left without interventions, will probably avoid a pioneer stage and direct recovery of the forests will be possible. Salvage logging had negative effects on species composition of the spruce forests, delayed the forest recovery, and should not be permitted in the national park. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据