3.8 Article

Decreased 5-HT transporter mRNA in neurons of the dorsal raphe nucleus and behavioral depression in the obese leptin-deficient ob/ob mouse

期刊

MOLECULAR BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 81, 期 1-2, 页码 51-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00167-4

关键词

serotonin; food intake; leptin receptor; brainstem; hypothalamus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neurotransmitter serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) is an important regulator of feeding behavior. A hypothalamic site of action for 5-HT in body weight control is supported by the presence of 5-HT receptors in hypothalamic regions which are intimately associated with regulation of food intake. In the present study we have investigated whether there may be an interaction between the hormone leptin, an adipose tissue-derived cytokine signaling factor that inhibits food intake and lowers body weight, and the brain serotonergic system. Immunohistochemical analysis of colchicine-treated rats showed colocalization of 5-HT transporter- and leptin receptor-immunoreactivity in cell bodies of the dorsal raphe nucleus, suggesting that dorsal raphe neurons are targets for circulating leptin. Levels of 5-HT transporter mRNA expression were compared in neurons of the dorsal raphe nucleus of obese leptin-deficient ob/ob mice and their lean littermates using in situ hybridization. 5-HT transporter mRNA levels were significantly down-regulated in neurons of the dorsal raphe nucleus of obese ob/ob mice as compared to lean control mice. Behavioral analysis showed that obese ob/ob mice had significantly lower locomotor activity and exhibited increased immobility in Porsolt's test, a model for depression. Taken together, these results suggest that serotonergic cell bodies in the rodent dorsal raphe nucleus possess leptin receptors and that the serotonergic system, as reflected by expression levels of 5-HT transporter mRNA, is down-regulated in the obese behaviorally depressed ob/ob mouse. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据