4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha-null mice lack resistance to acetaminophen hepatotoxicity following clofibrate exposure

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 338-344

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/57.2.338

关键词

acetaminophen (APAP); hepatoprotection; hepatotoxicity; PPAR alpha; clofibrate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether activation of the nuclear receptor PPAR alpha is needed for protection from acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity produced by repeated administration of the peroxisome proliferator clofibrate (CFB). Female wild-type and PPAR alpha-null mice received corn oil vehicle or 500 mg CFB/kg, ip, daily for 10 days. They were then fasted overnight (18 h) and either killed at 4 or 24 h after challenge with 400 mg APAP/kg. Controls received 50% propylene glycol vehicle only. In this model of CFB hepatoprotection, liver injury was assessed by measuring plasma sorbitol dehydrogenase activity and by;histopathology at 24 h after APAP challenge. Significant hepatocellular necrosis was evident in both corn oil-pretreated PPAR alpha-null and wild-type mice at 24 h after APAP challenge. In agreement with previous studies, CFB-pretreated wild-type mice showed marked protection against APAP toxicity, In contrast, CFB did not provide protection against APAP hepatotoxicity in the PPAR alpha-null mice. Similarly, at 4 h after APAP challenge, hepatic glutathione depletion and selective arylation of cytosolic proteins were reduced significantly in CFB-pretreated wild-type mice, but not in PPAR alpha-null mice. The lack of changes in APAP binding and NPSH depletion in CFB-pretreated, PPAR alpha-null mice is consistent with the presence of significant liver injury at 24 h in this treatment group. These findings demonstrate that the protection against APAP hepatotoxicity by peroxisome proliferator treatment is mediated by the activation of PPAR alpha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据