4.3 Article

Identification of collagen IV derived danger/alarm signals in insect immunity by nanoLC-FTICR MS

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 390, 期 12, 页码 1303-1311

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/BC.2009.128

关键词

collagen; danger signals; Galleria mellonella; innate immunity; insect model organism; integrin

资金

  1. European Union [LSHG-CT-2005-518194]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung BMBF [0313442]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [SP314/10-11]
  4. Heisenberg fellowship [AL 902/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immune system can be stimulated by microbial molecules as well as by endogenously derived danger/alarm signals of host origin. Using the lepidopteran model insect Galleria mellonella, we recently discovered that fragments of collagen IV, resulting from hydrolysis by microbial metalloproteinases, represent danger/alarm signals in insects. Here, we characterized immune-stimulatory peptides generated by thermolysin-mediated degradation of collagen IV using nanospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTICR MIS) after separation by nanoscale liquid chromatography (nanoLC). The combination of FTICR MIS analysis and de novo peptide sequencing resulted in the identification of 38 specific collagen IV fragments of which several peptides included the integrin-binding motif RGD/E known from numerous mammalian immune-related proteins. Custom-synthesized peptides corresponding either to the presently identified collagen peptide GIRGEHyp or to a well-known integrin-binding RGD peptide (GRGDS) were injected into G. mellonella to determine their immune-stimulatory activities in vivo. Both peptides stimulated immune cells and systemically the expression of lysozyme and a specific inhibitor of microbial metalloproteinases. Further examination using specific MAP kinase inhibitors indicated that MEK/ERK and p38 are involved in RGD/E-mediated immune-signaling pathways, whereas JNK seems to play only a minor role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据