4.4 Article

Overexpression of neutrophil neuronal nitric oxide synthase in Parkinson's disease

期刊

NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 534-539

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/niox.2000.0288

关键词

nitric oxide; Parkinson's disease; neutrophils; peroxynitrite; neuronal NOS; neurodegeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Much evidence supports a role of nitric oxide (NO) and peroxynitrite (ONOO-) in experimental and idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD); moreover, an overexpression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) was recently reported in the basal ganglia of PD patients. In accord, we previously found a 50% increased NO production rate during the respiratory burst of circulating Neutrophils (PMN) from PD patients. As PMN express the nNOS isoform, the objective of the present study was to ascertain whether this increased NO production is representative of nNOS gene upregulation. PMN were isolated from blood samples obtained from seven PD patients and seven age- and sex-matched healthy donors; nNOS mRNA was amplified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and the products were hybridized with a probe for nNOS. Nitrotyrosine-containing proteins and nNOS were detected by Western blot and NO production rate was measured spectrophotometrically by the conversion of oxymyoglobin to metmyoglobin. The results showed that both NO production and protein tyrosine nitration were significantly increased in PMN isolated from PD patients (PD 0.09 +/- 0.01 vs 0.06 +/- 0.008 nmol min(-1) 10(6) cells(-1); P < 0.05). In addition, five of the seven PD patients showed about 10-fold nNOS mRNA overexpression; while two of the seven PD patients showed an expression level similar to that of the controls; detection of nNOS protein was more evident in the former group. In summary, it is likely that overexpression of nNOS and formation of ONOO- in PMN cells from PD patients emphasizes a potential causal role of NO in the physiopathology of the illness. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据