4.7 Article

Symptomatic ischemic stroke in full-term neonates -: Role of acquired and genetic prothrombotic risk factors

期刊

STROKE
卷 31, 期 10, 页码 2437-2441

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.31.10.2437

关键词

factor V; lipoproteins; neonate; prothrombin; risk factors; stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-The present multicenter case-control study was prospectively designed to assess the extent to which single and combined clotting factor abnormalities influence the onset of symptomatic ischemic stroke in full-term neonates, Methods-Lipoprotein (Lp)(a); the factor V (FV) G1691A mutation; the prothrombin (PT) G20210A variant; the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) T677T genotype; antithrombin; protein C, protein S; and anticardiolipin antibodies (ACAs) were investigated in 91 consecutively recruited neonatal stroke patients and 182 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Results-Sixty-two of 91 stroke patients (68.1%) had at least 1 prothrombotic risk factor compared with 44 control subjects (24.2%) (odds ratio [OR]/95% confidence interval [CI], 6.70/3.84 to 11.67). An increased Lp(a) level (>30 mg/dL) was found in 20 patients and 10 controls (OR/95% CI, 4.84/2.16 to 10.86); FV G1691A was present in 17 patients and 10 controls (OR/95% CI, 3.95/1.72 to 9.0); the PT G20210A variant was detected in 4 patients and 4 controls (OR/95% CI, 2.04/0.49 to 8.3); the MTHFR TT677 genotype was found in 15 patients and 20 controls (OR/95% CI, 1.59/0.77 to 3.29); and protein C type I deficiency was found in 6 neonates. Neither antithrombin deficiency nor protein S deficiency was found in the neonatal patients studied. Acquired IgG ACAs were found in 3 cases. Additional triggering factors, ie, asphyxia, septicemia, maternal diabetes, and perinatally acquired renal venous thrombosis, were reported in 54.0% of patients. Conclusions-Besides acquired triggering factors, the data presented here suggest that genetic prothrombotic risk factors play a role in symptomatic neonatal stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据