4.8 Article

Dehydration activates an NF-κB-driven, COX2-dependent survival mechanism in renal medullary interstitial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 106, 期 8, 页码 973-982

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI9956

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK037097, 1-P50-DK-39261, DK-37097, P50 DK039261] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renal prostaglandin (PG) synthesis is mediated by cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 (COX1 and COX2). After dehydration, the maintenance of normal renal function becomes particularly dependent upon PG synthesis. The present studies were designed to examine the potential link between medullary COX1 and COX2 expression in hypertonic stress. In response to water deprivation, COX2, but not COX1, mRNA levels increase significantly in the renal medulla, specifically in renal medullary interstitial cells (RMICs). Water deprivation also increases renal NF-kappa B-driven reporter expression in transgenic mice. NF-kappa B activity and COX2 expression could be induced in cultured RMICs with hypertonic sodium chloride and mannitol, but not urea. RMIC COX2 expression was also induced by driving NF-kappa B activation with a constitutively active I kappa B kinase alpha (IKK alpha). Conversely, introduction of a dominant-negative I kappa B mutant reduced COX2 expression after hypertonicity or IKK alpha induction. RMICs failed to survive hypertonicity when COX2 was downregulated using a COX2-selective antisense or blocked with the selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) SC58236, reagents that did not affect cell survival in isotonic media. In rabbits treated with SC58236, water deprivation induced apoptosis of medullary interstitial cells in the renal papilla. These results demonstrate that water deprivation and hypertonicity activate NF-kappa B. The consequent increase in COX2 expression favors RMIC survival in hypertonic conditions. Inhibition of RMIC COX2 could contribute to NSAID-induced papillary injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据