4.3 Article

High Glucose Condition Induces Autophagy in Endothelial Progenitor Cells Contributing to Angiogenic Impairment

期刊

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 1248-1252

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b14-00172

关键词

endothelial progenitor cell; high glucose; autophagy; oxidative stress; diabetes; mitochondria

资金

  1. Hanyang University [201200000000204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular complications are the major causes of death in patients with diabetes mellitus. Several studies have demonstrated that endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), adult stem cells contributing to the regeneration of vascular endothelium, are dysfunctional under diabetic condition resulting in impaired peripheral circulation and delayed wound healing. In this study, we investigated the cellular alteration of EPCs under high glucose condition, to elucidate the mechanisms underlying diabetes-associated EPC dysfunction. EPCs were isolated from bone marrow and cultured in normal glucose (5.5 mM)- or high glucose (HG; 30 mM)containing medium. High glucose treated-EPCs showed decreased ability to form tubule-like networks in Matrigel compared to EPCs under normal glucose, which matched well to the clinical observation of diabetic EPC dysfunction. Conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II was increased in EPCs under HG condition, showing that HG induced autophagy in EPCs. Flow cytometric analysis revealed generation of oxidative stress and disruption of mitochondrial permeability in HG exposed EPCs. Increased mitochondrial oxidative stress was also observed by mitochondria-specific superoxide indicator, MitoSOX (TM). Taken together, we demonstrated that autophagy and mitochondrial impairment were induced in EPCs under high glucose condition, giving a new insight into the mechanism underlying dysfunction of diabetic EPCs. We hope that our finding can contribute to the development of a new treatment option for cardiovascular complications in diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据