4.3 Article

Terpene-Containing PEGylated Liposomes as Transdermal Carriers of a Hydrophilic Compound

期刊

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 1936-1943

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b14-00535

关键词

polyethylene glycol (PEG)ylated liposome; hydrophilic compound; skin permeation; confocal laser scanning microscopy

资金

  1. Thailand Research Funds through the Royal Golden Jubilee PhD Program [PHD/0091/2554]
  2. [5680016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effect of PEGylated liposomes (PLs) containing a terpene on the penetration of a hydrophilic compound through porcine skin. PLs composed of N-(carbonyl-methoxypolyethyleneglycol-2000)-1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (PEG(2000) DSPE), the sodium salt of PEG(2000) DSPE, phosphatidylcholine (PC), cholesterol (Chol), Tween 20, and d-limonene were prepared as carriers for fluorescein sodium (NaFI). The physicochemical characteristics of PLs and their effects on in vitro skin penetration were evaluated. Tape stripping was used to evaluate NaFI deposition in skin layers, and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used to investigate the depth of skin penetration and the pathways used by NaFI-loaded vesicles. PLs containing d-limonene were smaller and conferred higher entrapment efficiency and skin penetration on NaFI than did PLs and conventional liposomes (CLs). The deposition of NaFI from PLs with d-limonene was greater in epidermis and dermis (6.10 +/- 1.741 mu g) than stratum corneum (2.06 +/- 0.47 mu g). CLSM images revealed that NaFI penetrated into the deepest skin layer with maximum fluorescence intensity. NaFI penetrated deeper (180 mu m) in follicular than nonfollicular regions (145 mu m), suggesting a transfollicular pathway predominates in skin penetration by NaFI-loaded PLs. In conclusion, grafting PEG onto ultra-deformable liposomes may enhance transdermal NaFI delivery and may be used as a carrier to prolong liposome circulation time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据