4.6 Article

Joint inversion of receiver function and surface wave dispersion observations

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 99-112

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00217.x

关键词

body waves; crustal structure; inverse problem; inversion; layered media; surface waves

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We implement a method to invert jointly teleseismic P-wave receiver functions and surface wave group and phase velocities for a mutually consistent estimate of earth structure. Receiver functions are primarily sensitive to shear wave velocity contrasts and vertical traveltimes, and surface wave dispersion measurements are sensitive to vertical shear wave velocity averages. Their combination may bridge resolution gaps associated with each individual data set. We formulate a linearized shear velocity inversion that is solved using a damped least-squares scheme that incorporates a priori smoothness constraints for velocities in adjacent layers. The data sets are equalized for the number of data points and physical units in the inversion process. The combination of information produces a relatively simple model with a minimal number of sharp velocity contrasts. We illustrate the approach using noise-free and realistic noise simulations and conclude with an inversion of observations from the Saudi Arabian Shield. Inversion results for station SODA, located in the Arabian Shield, include a crust with a sharp gradient near the surface (shear velocity changing from 1.8 to 3.5 km s(-1) in 3 km) underlain by a 5-km-thick layer with a shear velocity of 3.5 km s(-1) and a 27-km-thick layer with a shear velocity of 3.8 km s(-1), and an upper mantle with an average shear velocity of 4.7 km s(-1). The crust-mantle transition has a significant gradient, with velocity values varying from 3.8 to 4.7 km s(-1) between 35 and 40 km depth. Our results are compatible with independent inversions for crustal structure using refraction data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据