4.5 Article

Mechanical behaviour of ceramic oxygen ion-conducting membranes

期刊

SOLID STATE IONICS
卷 134, 期 1-2, 页码 59-66

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00714-1

关键词

solid oxide fuel cells; ceramic membranes; mechanical properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In devices such as solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), oxygen separators and membrane reactors, the mechanical properties of the ceramic components are particularly important for estimating reliability. Here we summarise some recent studies of the mechanical properties of oxygen ion-conducting ceramics for the applications mentioned. Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of several materials of interest for SOFCs have now been characterised; including the effects of temperature and porosity on these parameters. The biaxial flexural strength and fracture toughness of tape-cast YSZ have been measured at room temperature and at a typical operating temperature of 900 degreesC. Fracture toughness decreases with increasing temperature; from 1.61+/-0.12 MPa m(0.5) at room temperature to 1.02+/-0.05 MPa m(0.5) at 900 degreesC. Flexural strength and fracture toughness were found to be quantitatively consistent with fracture being initiated at observed surface defects. YSZ has also been found to be susceptible to sub-critical crack growth. Many oxygen-ion conducting ceramics suffer from a chemically induced stress when subjected to a gradient in the thermodynamic activity of oxygen. Ceria and acceptor-doped lanthanum chromite are given as typical examples. One strategy for overcoming this problem in electrolytes is to laminate different materials. An example is given of CGO laminated with a thin layer of YSZ. The combined effects of improved microstructure and residual stress lead to the laminated membranes having higher apparent strength than single layer CGO membranes by a factor of between 1.75 and 4.06. Electrode/electrolyte laminates have been observed to have some unexpected behaviour. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据