4.5 Article

N-glycan analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of electrophoretically separated nonmammalian proteins:: Application to peanut allergen Ara h 1 and olive pollen allergen Ole e 1

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 285, 期 1, 页码 64-75

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/abio.2000.4737

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method has been developed which allows the analysis of glycoproteins separated by SDS-PAGE. The procedure, though applicable to N-glycosylated glycoproteins of any origin, is particularly devised for glycoproteins potentially containing fucose in alpha 1,3-linkage to the reducing GlcNAc as may be found in plants and invertebrates, e.g., insects and parasitic helminths. Starting with an established procedure for mass spectrometric peptide mapping, the analysis of N-glycans by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry involved the use of peptide:N-glycosidase A, a triphasic microcolumn for sample cleanup, and a new matrix mixture consisting of 2,5dihyhydroxybenzoic acid, 1-hydroxyisoquinoline, and arabinosazone. The method was tested on proteins with N-glycans of known structure, i.e., as horseradish peroxidase, zucchini ascorbate oxidase, soybean agglutinin, honeybee venom hyaluronidase, bovine ribonuclease B, and bovine fetuin. An electrophoretic band corresponding to 4 Erg of glycoprotein was generally sufficient to allow detection of the major N-glycan species. As an additional benefit, a peptide mass map is generated which serves to identify the analyzed protein. The method was applied to glycoprotein allergens whose glycan structures were unknown. Ara h 1 and Ole e 1, major allergens from peanut and olive pollen, respectively, contained mainly xylosylated N-glycans with the composition Man(3(-4))XylGlcNAc(2) in the case of Ara h 1 and GlcNAc(1-2)-Man(3)XylGlcNAc(2) in the case of Ole e 1 where also some GlcNAc(0-2)Man(3)XylFucGlcNAc(2) was found. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据