4.7 Article

Gender differences in chronic major and double depression

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00158-5

关键词

chronic depression; gender differences; age of onset; symptoms; family history; functional impairment

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [U01 MH061590] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: While the sex difference in prevalence rates of unipolar depression is well established, few studies have examined Sender differences in clinical features of depression. Even less is known about gender differences in chronic forms of depression. Methods: 235 male and 400 female outpatients with DSM-III-R chronic major depression or double depression (i.e., major depression superimposed on dysthymia) were administered an extensive battery of clinician-rated and self-report measures. Results: Women were less likely to he married and had a younger age at onset and greater family history of affective disorder compared to men. Symptom profile was similar in men and women, with the exception of more sleep changes, psychomotor retardation and anxiety/somatization in women. Women reported greater severity of illness and were more likely to have received previous treatment for depression with medications and/or psychotherapy. Greater functional impairment was noted by women in the area of marital adjustment, while men showed more work impairment. Limitations: Since our population consisted of patients enrolling in a clinical trial, study exclusion criteria may have affected gender-related differences found. Conclusions: Chronicity of depression appears to affect women more seriously than men, as manifested by an earlier age of onset, greater family history of affective disorders, greater symptom reporting, poorer social adjustment and poorer quality of life. These findings represent the largest study to date of gender differences in a population with chronic depressive conditions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据