4.5 Article

Antigen-induced IL-17 response in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of healthy controls

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 41-48

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01328.x

关键词

IL-17; antigens; cytokines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IL-17 is a T cell cytokine with a complex and important role in the immune system. It has been detected in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial membrane and found to stimulate the production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in vitro. To date, there are few data available on the agents that stimulate IL-17 production. We therefore investigated the in vitro IL-17 response to a variety of mitogens and antigens, and compared the IL-17 response to interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), IL-4, IL-IO and TNF-alpha. In this study we used a type-0 antigen, tetanus toroid (TT), a type-1 antigen, PPD from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a potential type-2 rye grass (RG) antigen (Lol I) and an autoantigen SS.B (La), to stimulate PBMC from healthy controls. Cytokine mRNA was measured using semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and cytokine protein measured using specific ELISA techniques, while the frequency of IL-17-producing T cells was determined by flow cytometry. The mitogens concanavalin A, phytohaemagglutinin and phorbol myristate acetate/ionomycin induced a significant increase in IL-17, with the highest levels being produced by antiCD3/anti-CD28 stimulation. The antigens TT and PPD significantly increased IL-17 mRNA expression over time, but failed to have such an effect at the protein level. IL-17 protein was also detectable in both antigen-specific (TT, SS.B) and non-specific T cell clones, but at levels lower than lFN-gamma. IL-17 production did not correlate with either the type-1 cytokine IFN-gamma or TNF-alpha or the type-2 cytokine IL-4 or IL-10 at either the mRNA or protein level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据