4.5 Article

Natural history of early colorectal cancer - Evolution of a growth curve

期刊

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
卷 43, 期 10, 页码 S18-S22

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1007/BF02237221

关键词

growth rate; early colorectal cancer; growth curve

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: There are very few studies on the development of early colorectal cancers, although we have previously reported growth speeds of early colorectal cancer in a radiographic retrospective study. The aim of this study was to estimate a statistical curve for cancer growth from mucosal cancer. METHODS: Subjects of the study were 31 patients with cancer in which initial lesions were diagnosed as mucosal cancer. These lesions were overlooked in the first or second investigations, but were detected later. Initial radiographic features were as follows; 4 pedunculated lesions, 1 semipedunculated lesion, 6 sessile lesions, 9 superficially elevated Lesions, and 11 superficially depressed lesions. The diameters of the initial Lesions were 12.1 +/- 6.1 mm. The final depths of invasion were 6 mucosal cancers, 12 submucosal cancers, 6 muscularis propria cancers, and 7 serosal cancers. The observation period between the initial and final examination was 41.5 +/- 25.8 months. The growth curve was estimated by an exponential curve with the natural logarithm of d = e((a + b x t)), where a is the intercept (initial tumor size) and b is the regression coefficient (growth speed). RESULTS: A growth curve was obtained as follows: diameter = 12.5 x 2((t/77)) (r = 0.448, P < 0.0001) and 95 percent confidence interval of rime = 53 to 173 months. Subsequently, volume = 1 X 10(3) X 2((t/26)) and the 95 percent confidence interval of time = 18 to 58 months. CONCLUSION: Growth speed of early colorectal cancer was estimated through a statistically significant growth curve. Estimated doubling time of the volume of early colorectal cancer was 26 (95 percent confidence interval, 18-58) months. From these results we could obtain a rational cancer surveillance program using appropriate procedures with different sensitivities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据