4.5 Review

α-aminoadipyl-cysteinyl-valine synthetases in β-lactam producing organisms -: From Abraham's discoveries to novel concepts of non-ribosomal peptide synthesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS
卷 53, 期 10, 页码 1008-1021

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.7164/antibiotics.53.1008

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tripeptide delta-(L-alpha -aminoadipyl)-L-cysteinyl-D-valine (ACV) was discovered by ARNSTEIN and MORRIS in Penicillium chrysogenum and ABRAHAM and coworkers in Acremonium chryogenum. Other analogous tripeptides and tetrapeptides were later reported in these and other beta -lactam producing fungi and actinomycetes. The ACV tripeptide is synthesized by a large non-ribosomal peptide synthetase named ACV synthetase encoded by the 11 kb pcbAB gene. This gene has been cloned from the DNA of four different filamentous fungi and two actinomycetes. Detailed analysis of the multifunctional ACV synthetases reveals that they consist of three repeated modules (initially named domains) involved in activation of the corresponding amino acids L-alpha -aminoadipic acid, L-cysteine and L-valine. Each module consists of functional domains for amino acid activation (A), condensation (C) and thiolation (T). In addition the last module of the ACV synthetase contains an epimerization domain (E) involved in conversion of the L-valine to its D-isomer when the tripeptide is still enzyme linked. There are seven epimerization motifs conserved in the third module of all ACV synthetases. In addition, there is an integrated thioesterase domain in the C-terminal region of the ACV synthetases that appears to be involved in the selective release of the tripeptide with the correct LLD configuration. The structure of the ACV synthetase is similar to that of other modular non-ribosomal peptide synthetases of bacterial and fungal origin. This molecular knowledge opens the way for engineering novel tripeptide synthetases that may result in new bioactive compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据