4.7 Article

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and liver-related mortality: a population-based cohort study in southern Italy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 922-927

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/29.5.922

关键词

binomial models; cohort study; HCV infection; liver-related mortality; Poisson models

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common cause of chronic liver diseases but the degree to which these diseases contribute to liver-related mortality is not well established. The aim of this study was to estimate the absolute and relative effects of HCV infection on liver-related mortality. Methods A population random sample of 2472 Subjects aged greater than or equal to 30 years was enrolled and followed up from 1985 to 1996. At enrolment, a structured interview and a clinical evaluation were performed. Serum samples were tested using HCV ELISA and RIBA HCV. Outcomes were overall and liver-related mortality and tracing procedures included review of office and hospital records, death certificates, and interviews with general practitioners, attending hospital and next of kin. Statistical analysis was performed using Poisson and binomial prospective data regression. Results Crude overall and liver-related mortality rates were 7.66 (95% CI:6.68-8.79) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.3-2.2) per 10(3) person-years, respectively. For HCV infection effect, incidence rate ratio and difference (per 103 person-year), risk ratio and difference were 27.5 (95% CI : 6.5-115.6), 4 (95% CI: 3-7), 33.1 (95% CI: 7.8-139.3) and 0.06 (95% CI : 0.04-0.08), respectively; all measures were adjusted for age at death, sex and daily alcohol intake. Conclusions The results show a strong relative but weak absolute effect of HCV infection on liver-related mortality in the 10-year period considered. Poisson and binomial models are virtually equivalent, but the choice of the summarizing measure of effect may have a different impact on health policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据