4.6 Article

A Meta-Analysis of Trabecular Bone Score in Fracture Risk Prediction and Its Relationship to FRAX

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 940-948

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2734

关键词

TRABECULAR BONE STRUCTURE; TBS; FRACTURE; RISK; FRAX; META-ANALYSIS

资金

  1. MediMaps
  2. Amgen
  3. Lilly
  4. Merck
  5. Alliance for Better Bone Health
  6. Consilient
  7. GE Lunar
  8. GSK
  9. Hologic
  10. Internis
  11. Novartis
  12. ONO
  13. Pfizer
  14. Roche
  15. Servier
  16. UCB
  17. Wyeth
  18. Shire
  19. MEDA
  20. Shire HGT
  21. NIH (US)
  22. RGC (HK)
  23. Genzyme
  24. NHMRC
  25. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science
  26. MRC [MR/K006312/1, MC_U147585819, G0400491, MC_U147585827] Funding Source: UKRI
  27. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26460788] Funding Source: KAKEN
  28. Medical Research Council [MC_U147585819, U1475000001, MC_UU_12011/1, U1475000002, MC_UP_A620_1014, G0400491, MR/K006312/1, MC_U147585824, MC_U147585827] Funding Source: researchfish
  29. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10082, NF-SI-0513-10085] Funding Source: researchfish
  30. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF14OC0010513, NNF13OC0005785] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a gray-level textural index of bone microarchitecture derived from lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images. TBS is a bone mineral density (BMD)-independent predictor of fracture risk. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether TBS predicted fracture risk independently of FRAX probability and to examine their combined performance by adjusting the FRAX probability for TBS. We utilized individual-level data from 17,809 men and women in 14 prospective population-based cohorts. Baseline evaluation included TBS and the FRAX risk variables, and outcomes during follow-up (mean 6.7 years) comprised major osteoporotic fractures. The association between TBS, FRAX probabilities, and the risk of fracture was examined using an extension of the Poisson regression model in each cohort and for each sex and expressed as the gradient of risk (GR; hazard ratio per 1 SD change in risk variable in direction of increased risk). FRAX probabilities were adjusted for TBS using an adjustment factor derived from an independent cohort (the Manitoba Bone Density Cohort). Overall, the GR of TBS for major osteoporotic fracture was 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.53) when adjusted for age and time since baseline and was similar in men and women (p > 0.10). When additionally adjusted for FRAX 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture, TBS remained a significant, independent predictor for fracture (GR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.24-1.41). The adjustment of FRAX probability for TBS resulted in a small increase in the GR (1.76, 95% CI 1.65-1.87 versus 1.70, 95% CI 1.60-1.81). A smaller change in GR for hip fracture was observed (FRAX hip fracture probability GR 2.25 vs. 2.22). TBS is a significant predictor of fracture risk independently of FRAX. The findings support the use of TBS as a potential adjustment for FRAX probability, though the impact of the adjustment remains to be determined in the context of clinical assessment guidelines. (C) 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据