4.4 Article

Susceptibility to oxidative stress of the Mediterranean demosponge Petrosia ficiformis:: role of endosymbionts and solar irradiance

期刊

MARINE BIOLOGY
卷 137, 期 3, 页码 453-461

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s002270000369

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of elevated pO(2) and irradiance as inducers of prooxidant conditions have been investigated in the Mediterranean demosponge Petrosia ficiformis (Poiret, 1789). This species lives symbiotically with the autotrophic cyanobacterium Aphanocapsa feldmanni, the abundance of which is controlled by the intensity of light irradiance. III the presence of symbionts, tissues of P. ficiformis were characterized by a general enhancement of antioxidant defenses as compared to aposymbiotic specimens. The main differences included higher activities of several antioxidant enzymes and a greater capability to neutralize various forms of oxyradicals, as indicated by the total oxyradical scavenging capacity (TOSC) assay. Elevated pO(2), more than light, appeared to be the primary factor inducing prooxidant pressure in the Mediterranean sponge; in fact, irrespective of the solar irradiance experienced by the sponge, symbiotic specimens showed comparable activities of antioxidant enzymes and a similar scavenging capacity towards various primary factor Mediterranean the the and a reactive oxygen species. However, the potential toxicity of photodynamic production of reactive oxygen species was demonstrated in organisms from more irradiated sites, as the levels of antioxidant defenses were lowered in the outer layer of the sponge. The role of enhanced antioxidant defenses in protecting symbiotic specimens, also from oxyradical-mediated toxicity of light exposure, was supported by translocation experiments; aposymbiotic sponges did not survive when moved to conditions of elevated solar irradiance, while no effects were observed in symbiotic specimens if translocated and/or deprived of symbionts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据