4.3 Article

Formulations for protecting the probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii from degradation in acidic condition

期刊

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 266-272

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.31.266

关键词

microsphere; tablet; Saccharomyces boulardii; viability conditions; probiotic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Saccharomyces boulardii is a nonpathogenic yeast with proven health benefits, some of them depending on its viability. However, the living yeast is sensitive to environmental conditions and its viability is less than 1% in the faeces after oral administration. Therefore, we assessed the survival conditions of S. boulardii in aqueous suspension and in its freeze-dried form and we formulated microspheres with the former and tablets with the latter in order to preserve the viability of the probiotic. While the viability of the yeast in aqueous suspension could be maintained for one year at -20 degrees C and +5 degrees C, increasing the temperature led to almost total mortality within 14 d at +40 degrees C and 4 d at +60 degrees C. The viability of the freeze-dried yeast was preserved for one year at +25 degrees C without moisture. With 75% relative humidity, the mortality was significant at 28d at + 25 degrees C and almost total within 1d at + 60 degrees C. In vitro, whereas less than 1% of non-encapsulated or non-tabletted S. boulardii survived after 120 min at pH 1.1, both formulations in microspheres and direct compression enabled to protect the yeast from degradation in HCl and to release it viable at pH 6.8. However, despite a similar release profile from both dosage forms, the compression led to a significant decrease in the viability of the freeze-dried yeast. In conclusion, although both formulations are efficient in protecting S. boulardii in acidic condition, microspheres provide a higher entrapment efficiency and a faster release of the viable probiotic in intestinal condition than matrix tablets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据