3.8 Article

Poor metabolizers at the cytochrome P450 2D6 and 2C19 loci are at increased risk of developing adult acute leukaemia

期刊

PHARMACOGENETICS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 605-615

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00008571-200010000-00004

关键词

adult acute leukaemia; cytochrome P450; polymorphism and predisposition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have genotyped over 550 cases of acute leukaemia and 950 matched controls from a population-based case-control study, to investigate the impact cytochrome P450s 2D6, 2C19 and 1A1 have on susceptibility to adult acute leukaemia. Analysis included potential associations between polymorphic status and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), plus the FAB and cytogenetic subtypes therein, A significant increased risk was found for CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype and acute leukaemia [odds ratio (OR)= 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-2.43], a risk also found in AML and ALL. No interaction was found with smoking, However, a significant age-related association between CYP2D6 polymorphism and acute myeloid leukaemia implied that the excess risk was confined to persons aged 40 years and over (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.53-3.71). Amongst AML cases, increased odds ratios were observed in both ne-novo (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.02-2.32) and secondary leukaemia (OR 2.83, 95% CI 0.91-8.77), and among patients with a chromosomal abnormality (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.11-3.61), An increased risk was found for the CYP2C19 poor metabolizer phenotype (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.97-2.92) which was also present in AML and ALL. For this CYP450 locus, an increased risk was suggested in secondary leukaemia (OR 2.67, 95% CI 0.44-16.3) and amongst AML cases with a chromosomal abnormality (OR 6.72, 95% CI 2.22-20.4). No difference in CYP1A1 genotype distribution was found for acute leukaemia, AML, ALL or any other diagnostic classification group used. No significant interactions between CYP2D6, CYP2C19 or CYP1A1 were found. Pharmacogenetics 10:605-615 (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据