4.7 Article

Investigation on the possible formation of N-nitroso-N-methylurea by nitrosation of creatinine in model systems and in cured meats at gastric pH

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 5088-5096

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf990918d

关键词

N-nitroso-N-methylurea; NMU; creatinine; cured meats; nitrite; determination of NMU in foods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-Nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU) is a highly potent direct-acting carcinogen that has been shown to induce cancer in a number of animal species. Although previous research has indicated that nitrosation of creatinine (CRN), a common constituent of meats, dried fish, and seafoods, can form trades of NMU, there is uncertainty as to (1) the yield of NMU and (2) whether detectable amounts of NMU can be formed from cured meats following nitrosation under acidic conditions given the low-residual levels of nitrite found in cured meats at the present time. Lack of sensitive and specific analytical methods most likely has hindered progress in research in these areas. An HPLC postcolumn denitrosation-thermal energy analyzer technique and a GC-MS confirmation technique were developed for the determination of NMU in cured meats. Both techniques are highly sensitive (0.5 and 0.03 ppb, respectively) and specific. The optimum pH for NMU formation from CRN ranged between pH 1 and pH 3, and the yields of NMU under variable reactant concentrations ranged between 0.00004 and 0.0046%. When 27 samples of various cured meats (10 g aliquots each) were acidified with HCl (final pH values of 0.8-2.5) and incubated at room temperature for 2 h, without arty additional nitrite, 24 gave results below detectable levels but 3 formed 2-26 ng of NMU/10 g bf meat. Incubation of the negative meats with additional nitrite (50-500 mug/g of meat) formed 0.6-176 ng of NMU/10 g of sample. Although the amounts of NMU formed were extremely small, this seems to be the first reported formation of NMU from cured meats with and without additional nitrite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据