4.7 Article

Differential role of angiotensin II receptor subtypes on endothelial superoxide formation

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 131, 期 4, 页码 667-672

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703566

关键词

angiotensin II receptor subtypes; superoxide anion; endothelial cell physiology; tyrosine phosphatases; Src homology 2 domain containing phosphatases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 The physiological role of the angiotensin II AT2 receptor subtype is not fully characterized. We studied whether AT2 receptor could antagonize AT1 mediated superoxide formation in endothelial cells. 2 In quiescent human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) superoxide formation was measured after long-term incubation (6 h) with angiotensin II in the presence or absence of its receptor blocker candesartan (AT1) or PD123319 (AT2) using the cytochrome c assay. In separate experiments, the effects of AT2 mediated effects on activities of cellular phosphates including the are homology 2 domain containing phosphatases (SHP-1) was studied. 3 The basal superoxide formation (0.19 +/- 0.03 nmol superoxide mg protein(-1) min(-1)) in HUVEC was increased by 37.1% after exposure to angiotensin II (100 nM,) which was due to an activation of a NAD(P)H oxidase. This was abolished by candesartan (1 muM) as well as the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein. In contrast, blockade of AT2 receptors by PD123319 enhanced the superoxide formation by 73.7% in intact cells. Stimulation of AT2 went along with an increased activity of tyrosine phosphatases in total cell lysates (29.8%) and, in particular, a marked stimulation of src homology 2 domain containing phosphatases (SHP-1, by 293.4%). The tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor vanadate, in turn, prevented the AT2 mediated effects on superoxide formation. The expression of both angiotensin II receptor subtypes AT1 and AT2 was confirmed by RT-PCR analysis. 4 It is concluded that AT2 functionally antagonizes the ATI induced endothelial superoxide formation by a pathway involving tyrosine phosphatases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据