4.6 Article

Reduction in myocardial apoptosis associated with overexpression of heat shock protein 70

期刊

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 5, 页码 397-403

出版社

DR DIETRICH STEINKOPFF VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s003950070039

关键词

heat shock protein; apoptosis; ischemia; hypoxia; gene transfection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is reported that ischemia-reperfusion induces apoptotic cell death in myocardium. It is also demonstrated that heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) enhances myocardial tolerance. Therefore, it is hypothesized that HSP70 may play a role in the attenuation of myocardial apoptosis. To elucidate this goal, HSP70-overexpressing and control-transfected rat hearts were prepared using gene transfection by intra-coronary infusion of the hemagglutinating virus of Japan-liposome. In vivo experiment Hearts of both groups were subjected to global ischemia, followed by reperfusion in situ. Shorter recovery time to spontaneous beating (HSP70-transfected vs control-transfected; 46.7 +/- 4.6 vs 67.5 +/- 7.0 s, p = 0.033) and lower serum CPK levels (415 +/- 27 vs 533 +/- 36 IU, p = 0.027) were observed in the HSP70-transfected group. The HSP70-transfected group also showed a lower percentage of cardiac myocytes positively stained by nick end labeling after ischemia-reperfusion (17.5 +/- 4.9 vs 40.0 +/- 5.1 %, p = 0.010). In vitro experiment Cardiac myocytes isolated from the hearts of both groups (prepared separately from the in vivo experiment) were subjected to hypoxia-reoxygenation. Flow cytometry was used to identify the cells that showed sub-G(1) DNA content as apoptotic cells. Apoptotic cells as a percentage of viable cells increased more in the control-transfected group after hypoxia-reoxygenation (13.0 +/- 0.77 vs 21.9 +/- 1.18 %, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, we demonstrated that apoptosis after ischemia-reperfusion was decreased in the HSP70-overexpressin heart in vivo and in vitro, leading to the suggestion that HSP70 could be associated with the reduction in myocardial apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据