4.3 Article

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidative enzyme status in Solanum lycopersicum on priming with fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. against Fusarium oxysporum

期刊

BIOLOGIA
卷 73, 期 11, 页码 1073-1082

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.2478/s11756-018-0125-3

关键词

Oxidative stress; Bio-priming; Enzymatic antioxidants; Fusarium oxysporum; Fluorescent Pseudomonas

类别

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, SERB-YSS scheme [YSS/2015/001905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In plants, ROS signaling and increase in activities of antioxidants are among defense responses. The present study describes the oxidative stress profiling in model host plant tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), during an invasion of the wilt pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici with or without seed priming with Pseudomonas isolates M80, M96 and T109. Tomato seeds were primed with known Pseudomonas isolates M80, M96 and T109 and the forty-day- old plants were challenged with spores of F. oxysporum under greenhouse conditions. Leaf samples were collected at 0, 24, 48 72 and 96h post fungal challenge and analysed for systemic level of oxidative stress parameters including total phenolics, proline, hydrogen peroxide, lipid peroxidation and enzymatic antioxidants. Disease incidence in the plants under greenhouse conditions was also calculated. Results revealed that priming with Pseudomonas isolates resulted in reduced oxidative stress in the host, during pathogen invasion. M80-priming showed highest antioxidative protection to the host plants during F. oxysporum invasion. The observed reduction in hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxidation in primed plants was in agreement with the increased activities of the corresponding antioxidant enzymes. Greenhouse results showed that the highest wilt disease symptoms were with M80-priming followed by M96 and T109. The present study gives substantial evidences on the oxidative stress mitigation in response to Pseudomonas-priming on the model tomato-Fusarium interaction system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据