4.7 Article

Survival in synchronous vs single lung cancer -: Upstaging better reflects prognosis

期刊

CHEST
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 952-958

出版社

AMER COLL CHEST PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.4.952

关键词

lung neoplasm; multiple primary neoplasm; neoplasm staging; non-small cell lung carcinoma; prognosis; pulmonary surgical procedures; survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To define prognostic parameters for patients with synchronous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design: Retrospective study of period from 1970 through 1997. Patients: Patients with a single (n = 2,764) and synchronous NSCLC (n = 85) who underwent pulmonary resection. Methods: All tumors were classified postsurgically, and the tumors of the patients with synchronous lung cancer were staged separately. The most advanced tumor was used for comparison. Actuarial survival time was estimated, and risk factors influencing survival were evaluated. Patients who died within 30 days of surgery were excluded. Measurement and results: Five-year survival for single NSCLC was 41% and for synchronous lung cancer it was 19%. The relative risk of death for patients,vith synchronous lung cancer was 1.75, compared to that for patients with single lung cancer. The most advanced tumor in synchronous cancer was a significant predictor of survival (p < 0.005). The survival of patients with synchronous lung cancer in which the most advanced tumors were stage I (n = 40) and stage II (n = 27) was not different from that of patients with stage II (n = 834) and stage IIIA (n = 405) single lung cancer, respectively. Conclusion: The poorer survival of patients with synchronous NSCLC is confirmed and quantified. The stage of the most advanced tumor was the best predictor of prognosis. The prognosis of patients with synchronous NSCLC resembles the prognosis of patients with a single lung cancer of a higher stage. Upstaging in synchronous lung cancer is recommended on the basis of these observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据