4.7 Article

Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening

期刊

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 323-334

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0725

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G9615910] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [G9615910] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G9615910] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background As part of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of flexible sigmoidoscopy for the prevention of bowel cancer, an investigation of the predictors of screening interest was carried out in a subsample of older adults. Method, The aim of the study was to establish the predictive power of the Health Belief Model (HBM) and to evaluate the contribution of HEM elements in mediating the effect of other demographic and health variables which have been found to be associated with screening interest and participation. A total of 5,099 participants were sent a postal questionnaire which examined screening interest, attitudes toward screening (benefits and barriers), perceived bowel cancer risk, bowel cancer worry, bowel symptoms, health status, state anxiety, and optimism. A total of 3,648 questionnaires were returned completed, giving a response rate of 71.5%. Results. The results showed that threat, barriers, and benefits explained 47% of the variance in interest. Demographic and health variables were also associated with screening interest, although most of their effect was mediated by the HBM constructs, Discussion. This community study in older adults showed a high level of interest in participating in screening. The large sample size provided the opportunity to test the value of the HEM model and to examine mediation of demographic and health variables. The HEM proved to be a good model of screening interest. These results further our understanding of the decision processes in participating in cancer screening and point to directions to increase the level of participation in community samples. (C) 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据