4.6 Review

Magic-angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage - A review

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 10, 页码 602-621

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200010000-00007

关键词

cartilage; magic-angle effect; laminar appearance; MRI; collagen structure; T2 mapping; heterogeneity; water-proteoglycan interaction

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR045172, 1 R01 AR45172-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. The laminar appearance of articular cartilage in magnetic resonance (MR) images has been a source of confusion, especially concerning the number, intensity, thickness, and origin of the layers. The laminar appearance is associated with the magic-angle effect in the MR imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage, METHODs. This article introduces the topic with background information about cartilage and the magic-angle effect and then reviews the literature about the magic-angle effect. The re,ie cv concludes with a brief discussion of the future directions of study and the potential clinical relevance of the laminae in MR images of articular cartilage, CONCLUSIONS. Tbe magic-angle effect is commonly seen in MR images of several tissues. The direct cause of the laminar appearance of articular cartilage is the T2 relaxation anisotropy in the tissue which is closely linked to the structure of the collagen fibers, their orientation in the magnetic field, and the water-proteoglycan interaction that amplifies the prevailing orientation of the collagen fiber network. The laminar appearance of cartilage has an intrinsic spatial heterogeneity over the two-dimensional joint surface, which leads to inconsistencies in the reported total number of cartilage laminae and the laminar patterns observable in MRI, depending on where the sample was taken. Tyro additional thin, low-intensity laminae mag also be visible at the boundaries of the cartilage with fluid and with bone; whether these boundary laminae are identified and counted with the others map introduce inconsistency in the results reported by various researchers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据