4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Modulation of the startle response and startle laterality in relatives of schizophrenic patients and in subjects with schizotypal personality disorder: Evidence of inhibitory deficits

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 157, 期 10, 页码 1660-1668

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PRESS, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.1660

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-01436, MH-42228, MH-01124, K20 MH001124-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders have been shown to have deficits in sensorimotor gating as assessed by prepulse inhibition of the startle response. The authors hypothesized that nonschizophrenic relatives of patients with schizophrenia would also have prepulse inhibition deficits, thereby reflecting a genetically transmitted susceptibility to sensorimotor gating deficits. Method: Twenty-five comparison subjects. 23 patients with schizophrenia, 34 relatives of the schizophrenic patients, and 11 subjects with schizotypal personality disorder were assessed in an acoustic startle paradigm. The eye-blink component of the startle response was assessed bilaterally by using electromyographic recordings of orbicularis oculi. Results: The patients with schizophrenia, their relatives, and subjects with schizotypal personality disorder ail had reduced prepulse inhibition relative to comparison subjects, and these deficits were more evident in measures of right eve-blink prepulse inhibition. Comparison subjects demonstrated greater right versus left eye-blink prepulse inhibition, whereas the probands, their relatives, and subjects with schizotypal personality disorder showed less asymmetry of prepulse inhibition. Conclusions: These data suggest a genetically transmitted deficit in prepulse inhibition (sensorimotor gating) in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, including subjects with schizotypal personality disorder and relatives of patients with schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据