4.6 Article

Novel subtype of type IIs restriction enzymes -: BfiI endonuclease exhibits similarities to the EDTA-resistant nuclease Nuc of Salmonella typhimurium

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 40, 页码 30878-30885

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M003350200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The type IIs restriction enzyme BfiI recognizes the non-palindromic nucleotide sequence 5'-ACTGGG-3' and cleaves complementary DNA strands 5/4 nucleotides downstream of the recognition sequence. The genes coding for the BfiI restriction-modification (R-M) system were cloned/sequenced and biochemical characterization of BfiI restriction enzyme was performed. The BfiI R-M system contained three proteins: two N4-methylcytosine methyltransferases and a restriction enzyme, Sequencing of bisulfite-treated methylated DNA indicated that each methyltransferase modifies cytosines on opposite strands of the recognition sequence. The N-terminal part of the BfiI restriction enzyme amino acid sequence revealed intriguing similarities to an EDTA-resistant nuclease of Salmonella typhimurium. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that BfiI, like the nuclease of S. typhimurium, cleaves DNA in the absence of Mg2+ ions and hydrolyzes an artificial substrate bis(p-nitrophenyl) phosphate. However, unlike the nonspecific S. typhimurium nuclease, BfiI restriction enzyme cleaves DNA specifically. We propose that the DNA-binding specificity of BfiI stems from the C-terminal part of the protein. The catalytic N-terminal subdomain of BfiI radically differs from that of type II restriction enzymes and is presumably similar to the EDTA-resistant nonspecific nuclease of S. typhimurium; therefore, BfiI did not require metal ions for catalysis. We suggest that BfiI represents a novel subclass of type IIs restriction enzymes that differs from the archetypal KokI endonuclease by the fold of its cleavage domain, the domain location, and reaction mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据