4.6 Article

Structural basis of hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase activity elucidated by site-directed mutagenesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 40, 页码 31239-31244

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M000750200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hematopoietic prostaglandin (PG) D synthase (PGDS) is the first identified vertebrate ortholog in the Sigma class of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) family and catalyzes both isomerization of PGH, to PGD, and conjugation of glutathione to 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene. We introduced site directed mutations of Tyr(8), Arg(14), Trp(104), Lys(112), Tyr(152), Cys(156), Lys(198), and Leu(199), which are presumed to participate in catalysis or PGH(2) substrate binding based on the crystallographic structure. Mutants were analyzed in terms of structure, GST and PGDS activities, and activation of the glutathione thiol group. Of all the mutants, only Y8F, W104I, K112E, and L199F showed minor but substantial differences in their far-UV circular dichrcoism spectra from the wild-type enzyme, Y8F, R14K/E, and W104I were completely inactive. C156L/Y selectively lost only PGDS activity. K112E reduced GST activity slightly and PGDS activity markedly, whereas K198E caused a selective decrease in PODS activity and K-m for glutathione and PGH(2) in the PODS reaction. No significant changes were observed in the catalytic activities of Y152F and L199F, although their K-m for glutathione was increased. Using 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) as an SE-selective agent, we found that only Y8F and R14E/K did not accelerate the reactivity of the glutathione thiol group under the low reactivity condition of pH 5.0. These results indicate that Lys(112), Cys(156) and Lys(198) are involved in the binding of PGH,; Trp(104) is critical for structural integrity of the catalytic center for GST and PODS activities; and Tyr(8) and Arg(14), essential for activation of the thiol group of glutathione.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据