4.5 Article

Hydrodynamic pressure sensing with an artificial lateral line in steady and unsteady flows

期刊

BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/7/3/036004

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [FP7-ICT-2007-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the overall goal being a better understanding of the sensing environment from the local perspective of a situated agent, we studied uniform flows and Karman vortex streets in a frame of reference relevant to a fish or swimming robot. We visualized each flow regime with digital particle image velocimetry and then took local measurements using a rigid body with laterally distributed parallel pressure sensor arrays. Time and frequency domain methods were used to characterize hydrodynamically relevant scenarios in steady and unsteady flows for control applications. Here we report that a distributed pressure sensing mechanism has the capability to discriminate Karman vortex streets from uniform flows, and determine the orientation and position of the platform with respect to the incoming flow and the centre axis of the Karman vortex street. It also enables the computation of hydrodynamic features which may be relevant for a robot while interacting with the flow, such as vortex shedding frequency, vortex travelling speed and downstream distance between vortices. A Karman vortex street was distinguished in this study from uniform flows by analysing the magnitude of fluctuations present in the sensor measurements and the number of sensors detecting the same dominant frequency. In the Karman vortex street the turbulence intensity was 30% higher than that in the uniform flow and the sensors collectively sensed the vortex shedding frequency as the dominant frequency. The position and orientation of the sensor platform were determined via a comparative analysis between laterally distributed sensor arrays; the vortex travelling speed was estimated via a cross-correlation analysis among the sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据