4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Temporal association between hospitalization and rate of falls after discharge

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 160, 期 18, 页码 2788-2795

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2788

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [K08AG00623, K08AG00808-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Evidence suggests that acute illness and hospitalization may increase the risk for falls. Objective: To evaluate the rate of falls, and associated risk factors, for 90 days following hospital discharge. Methods: We consecutively enrolled 311 patients, aged 65 years and older, discharged from the hospital after an acute medical illness and receiving home-nursing services. Patients were assessed within 5 days of discharge for prehospital and current functioning by self-report, and balance, vision, cognition, and delirium by objective measures. Patients were followed up weekly for 13 weeks for falls, injuries, and health care use. Results: The rate of falls was significantly higher in the first 2 weeks after hospitalization (8.0 per 1000 person-days) compared with 3 months later (1.7 per 1000 person-days) (P=.002). Fall-related injuries accounted for 15% of all hospitalizations in the first month after discharge. Independent prehospital risk factors significantly associated with falls included dependency in activities of daily living, use of a standard walker, 2 or more falls, and more hospitalizations in the year prior. Posthospital risk factors included use of a tertiary amine tricyclic antidepressant, probable delirium, and poorer balance, while use of a cane was protective. Conclusions: The rate of falls is substantially increased in the first month after medical hospitalization, and is an important cause of injury and morbidity. Posthospital risk factors may be potentially modifiable. Efforts to assess and modify risk factors should be integral to the hospital and posthospital care of older adults (those aged greater than or equal to 65 years).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据