4.5 Article

Thermogravimetric measurement of hydrogen absorption in alkali-modified carbon materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 104, 期 40, 页码 9460-9467

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp000957o

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have prepared Li-doped multiwall carbon nanotubes and Li- and K-intercalated graphite and measured their hydrogen storage properties using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TCA). In a flowing 1-12 atmosphere Li-doped nanotubes and Li-intercalated graphite both exhibit a cyclable weight gain between 200 and 300 degreesC and weight loss between 400 and 500 degreesC characterized by a distinct and unusual temperature profile. We find, however, that neither H-2 nor carbon is required to generate this TGA feature; we observe it even in Li-containing samples measured in flowing Ar without H-2 and in LiOH samples measured in either Wt or Ar. Potassium-intercalated graphite shows mass cycling with a different thermal character between 40 and 250 degreesC, but as with H-2, observation of a large cyclable feature does not rely on the presence of H-2 In both cases we identify the cycling mass to be absorption/desorption of H2O present as an impurity in the TGA atmosphere. The temperature signatures we observe are strikingly similar to those reported in a recent study of Li- and K-doped carbon nanofibers in which mass uptakes as large as 20 wt% were attributed to hydrogen absorption. When the impurities in the TGA atmosphere are reduced as much as possible we do detect modest weight changes in K-intercalated graphite which we interpret as true hydrogen absorption at 1.3 wt %, of which 0.2 wt % is cyclable. This level of hydrogen absorption is consistent with pressure-composition isotherm measurements on the same material using a gas reaction controller (1.0 wt % total absorption with 0.3 wt % cyclable). We do not detect any evidence of hydrogen absorption by Li-containing carbon materials under our experimental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据