4.7 Article

Focal adhesion kinase is involved in angiotensin II-mediated protein synthesis in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 8, 页码 710-716

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.87.8.710

关键词

FRNK; adenovirus; cytochalasin D; p70S6 kinase; extracellular signal-regulated kinase

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL34328, HL63711, HL56046] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rate of vascular smooth muscle cell protein synthesis and cellular hypertrophy in response to angiotensin II (Ang II) is dependent on activation of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and both the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 and p70(S6K) pathways. One potential PTK that may regulate these signaling cascades is focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a nonreceptor PTK associated with focal adhesions. We used an actin depolymerizing agent, cytochalasin D (Cyt-D), and a replication-defective adenovirus encoding FAK-related nonkinase (FRNK), an inhibitor of FAK-dependent signaling, as tools to assess whether FAK was upstream of the ERK1/2 and/or the p70(S6K) pathways. Cyt-D reduced basal FAK phosphorylation and blocked Ang II-dependent FAK phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner. Confocal microscopy indicated that Cyt-D induced actin filament disruption and FAK delocalization from focal adhesions. Cyt-D also reduced Ang II-induced ERK1/2 activation, but p70(S6K) activation was relatively unaffected. Cyt-D reduced basal protein synthetic rate and substantially reduced the Ang II-induced increase in protein synthesis. Similarly, FRNK overexpression blocked Ang II-induced FAK phosphorylation and ERK1/2 activation, but not p70S6K phosphorylation, and markedly inhibited protein synthesis. This is the first report to demonstrate that FAK is a critical component of the signal transduction pathways that mediate Ang II-induced ERK1/2 activation, c-fos induction, and enhanced protein synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据