4.7 Article

novoCaller: a Bayesian network approach for de novo variant calling from pedigree and population sequence data

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 1174-1180

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty749

关键词

-

资金

  1. Brigham Research Institute (BRI)
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM078598, HG007229]
  3. NIH Common Fund, through the Office of Strategic Coordination/Office of the NIH Director [U01HG007690]
  4. NIH-NIDCR National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [5U01DE024443]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation De novo mutations (i.e. newly occurring mutations) are a pre-dominant cause of sporadic dominant monogenic diseases and play a significant role in the genetics of complex disorders. De novo mutation studies also inform population genetics models and shed light on the biology of DNA replication and repair. Despite the broad interest, there is room for improvement with regard to the accuracy of de novo mutation calling. Results We designed novoCaller, a Bayesian variant calling algorithm that uses information from read-level data both in the pedigree and in unrelated samples. The method was extensively tested using large trio-sequencing studies, and it consistently achieved over 97% sensitivity. We applied the algorithm to 48 trio cases of suspected rare Mendelian disorders as part of the Brigham Genomic Medicine gene discovery initiative. Its application resulted in a significant reduction in the resources required for manual inspection and experimental validation of the calls. Three de novo variants were found in known genes associated with rare disorders, leading to rapid genetic diagnosis of the probands. Another 14 variants were found in genes that are likely to explain the phenotype, and could lead to novel disease-gene discovery. Availability and implementation Source code implemented in C++ and Python can be downloaded from https://github.com/bgm-cwg/novoCaller. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据