4.7 Article

Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 284, 期 15, 页码 1962-1964

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.15.1962

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Surveys have shown that 60 million persons in the United States searched for health information online in 1998. However, lack of sampling-from a clinic population limits the generalizability of these surveys to clinical practice, Objectives To determine gastroenterology patients' access to and use of the Web as a medical information resource, to identify for what information patients search, and to determine how often physicians recommend that patients search the Web. Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional survey of 1006 gastroenterology outpatients in Durharn, NC, and Rockford, ill, conducted in August 1999. Main Outcome Measures Patient characteristics and education level, access to the Web, use of the Web as a medical information resource, search methods, and plans for future Web use. Results A total of 924 patients (92%) completed the questionnaire. Median age was 53 years, 41% were men, and the median education level was having completed some college. Fifty percent (462/924) reported having access to the Web. Of the 462 with access, 235 (51%) had searched the Web for medical information within the previous 12 months. Therefore, 25.5% of all patients surveyed had searched the Web for medical information within the previous year. Sixty percent of patients intended to use the Web as a medical information resource in the future, Only 35 (4%) of 825 had ever been referred to the Web by a physician, Conclusions In this clinic setting, more than one quarter of gastroenterology outpatients reported having obtained medical information from the Web within the previous year. More than two thirds of patients stated they would use the Web as a medical information resource in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据